Marketing analytics is often seen as a key tool in measuring the success of online campaigns.
Yet, marketers are increasingly questioning the accuracy of their results.
The following are three areas of marketing analytics to study with a skeptical eye, due to their potential for skewed results
Inflated Page Views
Websites often split content across several pages to increase page views, creating an illusion of more traffic and engagement.
However, each page transition counts as a new view, boosting “impression” stats for the ads contained on these pages.
This raises the question: does a user clicking through multiple pages genuinely engage with the ads they see, or do they suffer from ad fatigue?
The effectiveness of these impressions for advertisers is questionable, therefore, read the resulting analytics with this in mind.
Ad Overload
A single webpage crammed with ads resembles a street cluttered with competing billboards (think Time Square).
The space becomes over-saturated, and ads turn into background noise rather than effective marketing.
The number of impressions might be high, but their impact is diluted. Can advertisers really trust these figures when the attention their ads receive is so fragmented?
Questionable Accountability
The anonymity of the internet complicates the tracking of genuine engagement.
Fake profiles, bots, and misleading information from privacy-conscious users can warp the understanding of who is interacting with content.
For marketers who need to know their audience, these uncertainties make the data less reliable.
The high counts of page views and impressions may be enticing, but they don’t guarantee that people are paying attention.
Marketers should delve into user behavior and the quality of engagement to gain meaningful insights for strategic planning.
Please contact our customer service team at 833-875-8800 if there is anything we can do to help you succeed.
